Notes
Outline
Transitional Justice in
Sierra Leone
A Minnesota Advocates for Human Rights Monitoring Trip
May 7-20, 2004
"Founded in 1983."
Founded in 1983.
Dedicated to promoting and protecting internationally recognized human rights.
Has more than 600 active volunteers.
Enjoys Special Consultative Status with the United Nations.
Provides investigative fact-finding through innovative programming.
Has produced more than 50 reports documenting human rights practices in more than 30 countries.
Slide 3
Participants
Dianne Heins   Pro Bono Counsel
  Faegre & Benson
Muria Kruger   Attorney
  Heins, Mills & Olson, P.L.C.
Rosalyn Park   Staff Attorney
           Minnesota Advocates for Human Rights
Jennifer Prestholdt  Deputy Director
   Minnesota Advocates for Human Rights
Jeremy Prestholdt    Professor of African History
   Northeastern University
Members of Sierra Leone Team in Koidu
Slide 6
Slide 7
Slide 8
Slide 9
Comparisons
Background on Sierra Leone
In 2002, at the end of more than ten years of violent armed conflict
"In 2002,"
In 2002, at the end of more than ten years of violent armed conflict
The government and international community forced to design reintegration programs for 70,000 ex-combatants.
The average life span had dropped to 37 years (in 2003, it fell to 34 years – the shortest in the world).
Civil society was in tatters.
The population was suffering from enormous psychological trauma from the widespread and systematic violence.
Many children were orphaned by the conflict
Slide 15
Sierra Leone was left with a decimated economy
A nation famous for rice production was now importing rice.





Sierra Leone was at the bottom of the UN Development Program’s overall global rankings.
It is critical to note that the war in Sierra Leone was NOT the result of ethnic or religious rivalry
It was a war:
 waged out of frustration over corruption
 fueled by looting and the sale of diamonds
 driven by the forced recruitment of youth and children
 perpetuated by the
international
community’s
indifference
History of Sierra Leone
 Populated primarily by Temne and Mende peoples; Portuguese named it “Lion Mountain”.
 Founded by African American refugees who were promised their freedom if they joined the British during the American Revolution.
 Given passage and land by the British Sierra Leone Company, they settled in Freetown in 1787.
History of Sierra Leone
Krio, a language based on 18th century African American English, remains the lingua franca.
British and American abolitionists saw Freetown as embodying the possibilities of a post-slave trade Africa.
Freetown grew exponentially in the 19th century as Africans rescued by the British Anti-Slave Trade Squadron were resettled in the city.
But refugee settlers were largely disconnected from the people of rural Sierra Leone.
Seeds of the Conflict
After independence from Britain in 1961, there were a series of coups and counter-coups.
1978 declaration of a one-party state with the All People’s Congress (APC) as the only legal political party.
The APC remained in power until early 1990s.
Seeds of the Conflict
The APC was notorious for widespread corruption and clientelism, resulting in the inequitable distribution of contracts, government positions and much of the nation’s natural resources.
At the same time, underemployment and lack of access to education produced a massive urban and rural underclass. By 1991, unemployment rate was nearly 50%.
Provided the ideal situation for recruiting undereducated and frustrated youth in both urban and rural areas.
Main Groups Involved in the Conflict
Revolutionary United Front (RUF)
Began in 1980s when political radicals gained assistance from Libya and Liberia in planning violent overthrow of Sierra Leone government.
After Liberian civil war begins in 1989, Charles Taylor offers a base in Liberia.
SL dissidents and hundreds of recruits form the RUF under leadership of Foday Sankoh.
RUF initially promotes populist message of democracy, equity and free education.
Revolutionary United Front (RUF)
RUF soon turns to fear tactics, including mass rape, murder, forced recruitment of children and amputations.
RUF brutalities
most extreme
under the
command of
Sam “Maskita”
Bockarie.
Republic of Sierra Leone Military Force (RSLMF)
Led by various generals
 and heads of state,
including current president
Ahmed Tejan Kabbah.
Ahmed Tejan Kabbah.
Soldiers often switch to rebel side, and switch back, prompting the term SOBEL (Soldier/Rebel)
Also implicated in looting and mass rape.
Civil Defense Forces (CDF)
Local militias and hunting organizations (KAMAJORS) recruited by government.
Led by Sam Hinga Norman.
Have more success against
the RUF than RSLMF.
Also engage in
mass rape, forced
recruitment of children,
murder and cannibalism.
Armed Forces Revolutionary Council (AFRC)
Coalition of dissident army officers led by Johnny Paul Koroma.
Collaborates with RUF.
Also engages in
widespread human
rights abuses against
civilians.
Economic Community (of West Africa) Monitoring Group (ECOMOG)
Mostly Nigerian military force.
Invade Freetown in 1997 and 1999 at request of President Kabbah.
Also uses violent tactics such as rape and indiscriminate killing of suspected RUF sympathizers.
The Conflict Begins
In 1991, the RUF invades eastern Sierra Leone with the aid of Charles Taylor.
The RUF’s populist message wanes as Sankoh consolidates power through internal purges and distributing looted goods to recruits.
RUF begins practice of taking “bush wives” (forcibly abducting girls and women into sexual slavery and pseudo-marriage).
Slide 30
The Conflict Begins
The underfunded and undertrained RSLMF loses several towns in the diamond-rich Eastern districts.
By the mid-1990s, RSLMF soldiers are also looting, raping and preying on civilians.
As a result, government begins to turn to CDF to stem the RUF tide.
Major Turning Points in the War: 1992-93
Facing an increasingly suspicious populace, by 1992-93, the RUF turns to fear tactics.  By making people afraid, they hope to keep them from supporting the government.
As it becomes harder to recruit young people, the RUF begins forcing children (some as young as 5) to fight.
RUF commanders often forced children to kill members of their own families and rape or maim members of their home communities.  Breaking social taboos both alienated children from their communities and made it more difficult for them to return home.
RUF also used heroin and cocaine addiction to manipulate young people to carry out atrocities.
Slide 33
Major Turning Points in the War: 1994-96
By 1994-95, fighting between the RUF and RSLMF had dropped off as both prey on local civilian populations.
The government thus begins funding and depending on the CDF.
Valentin Strasser, leader of a 1992 military coup is ousted in 1996.
Ahmed Tehan Kabbah elected President in 1996.
Kabbah signs a Peace Accord with the RUF.
Slide 35
Major Turning Points in the War: 1997-98
In 1997, Johnny Paul Koroma’s AFRC seizes power, suspends Constitution, and abolishes political parties.
RUF invited to share power with AFRC.
RUF enters Freetown and targets officials, business people and anyone seen to represent the government. Also begin a campaign of mass rape.
In January 1998, ECOMOG forces invade Freetown. For the rest of the year, fighting between ECOMOG/CDF and RUF in central districts.
"But the RUF continues to..."
But the RUF continues to control diamond mines, a multi-million dollar industry, which allows them to continue buying arms from Liberia.
Slide 38
Major Turning Points in the War: 1999
RUF once again seizes Freetown in January 1999.
Violent reprisals against local populations include mass rape and amputations.  Amputations of hands and arms in response to Kabbah’s 1996 campaign message: “Let’s use our hands to rebuild Sierra Leone”.
ECOMOG/CDF successfully remove RUF again, but also commit serious human rights abuses.
By 1999, RUF is willing to negotiate peace and signs Lome Peace Accord.
Slide 40
The End of the War
Although UN troops arrive in Sierra Leone, Sam “Maskita” Bockarie vows to continue fighting.
In 2000, the RUF win a series of victories against UN forces and begin to close in on Freetown a third time.
Under international pressure, the British send troops. Foday Sankoh is soon captured.
By 2001, UN peacekeepers occupy RUF territory and large-scale disarmament begins.
January 1, 2002 – official declaration that the war is over.
Slide 42
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission
Establishing the TRC
In 1999, the Lomé Peace Agreement between rebel fighters and the government called for the establishment of a truth and reconciliation commission
In 2000, an act of the Sierra Leonean Parliament officially established the TRC and set out more specific details on its operation.  The TRC did not become operational until late 2002 because of continuing violence in the country
Mandate of the TRC
Establish an impartial historical record of violations and abuses of human rights and humanitarian law related to the conflict in Sierra Leone for period starting in 1991 and ending with the signing of the Lomé Agreement (1999)
Address impunity
Respond to victims’ needs
Promote healing and reconciliation
Prevent repetition of violations and abuses
TRC Logistics
7 TRC Commissioners:
4 Sierra Leoneans
Bishop Humper, a Sierra Leonean, is the chair
3 internationals
A Gambian, Canadian and a South African
Time line:
Authorized to take 15 months (including a 3 month preparatory period) with the possibility of a six month extension
Divided its work into three stages: 4 months each for statement taking, public hearings, and report writing
Budget:
Less than $4.5 million donated by the international community and the government of Sierra Leone
Phase 1:  Statement Taking
Began in April of 2003
9,500 individual statements taken
73 statement takers and 3 regional coordinators
1/3 of statement takers and regional coordinators were women
Phase 2:  Public Hearings
The TRC held public hearings at each of the 14 districts in Sierra Leone for one week for a 3-month period
The Commissioners split up into two hearing panels to hear more testimony in each district.
Over 450 people testified
About 13% were ex-combatants
Victims of sexual violence could testify in private or behind a screen
President Kabbah testified for two hours at the final  hearing in August 2003
He refused an invitation to apologize on behalf of the State for many of the abuses suffered in Sierra Leone
Concluding Phase 2:
National Reconciliation Ceremony
National Reconciliation Ceremony held after hearings complete
Everyone marched from Victoria Park to the National Stadium.  Numerous people spoke at the stadium, including apologies by the Army, police and RUF Party.
Ceremony ended by renaming and dedicating bridge in Freetown as the “Peace Bridge"
Phase 3:  Report Writing
Began writing the report in 2003.
Supposed to be out in April 2004, still not released yet
Initial Findings
All three combatant groups targeted civilians
All three combatant groups often targeted civilians to the exclusion of fighting each other
The Report
Will be in 4 volumes
Administration, finances and operations
Methods and findings
Statements and archives
Recommendations
Will be published in a child-friendly, a simple language and a video version
Witness (an NGO) made a fifty minute documentary of the findings of the TRC
Recommendations
Will include recommendations to the Sierra Leonean government, NGOs and the international community
Will be broken down into categories to indicate urgency of implementation
Imperatives
serious considerations
desirable results
Will name individuals in the military and police who committed violations
Will seek to address different sectors of the population – children, amputees, women, etc..
Implementing the Recommendations
A seven member National Human Rights Commission will be the successor to the TRC
Not yet established, Parliament is in the process of creating it
Will include both national and international representation
The Commission will be responsible for
Monitoring and facilitating implementation of the recommendations and
Providing quarterly reports to the President on status of implementation
The Human Rights Committee
A parliamentary Human Rights Committee was created in 2003 to be a permanent forum for deliberation on human rights issues
This committee is responsible for drafting the legislation to establish the Human Rights Commission
NGOs have worked with this Committee to draft this legislation
The Special Court for Sierra Leone
The Special Court for
Sierra Leone
In August 2000, United Nations Security Council passes Resolution 1315, mandating the creation of the Special Court for Sierra Leone
Court was established by agreement between Sierra Leone and the United Nations in early 2002.
Limited Jurisdictional mandate: To prosecute those who bear the greatest responsibility for serious violations of international humanitarian law and Sierra Leonean law occurring between 30 November 1996 and 1999
Slide 57
The Special Court for
Sierra Leone
Four Pillars of the Special Court
Registry
Office of the Prosecutor
Defense Office
Chambers
Registry:
 Chief Court Administrator
Assists other offices
Responsible for personnel: 304 staff members, 45% international and 55% Sierra Leone nationals
Oversees Court management and promulgation of Court documents
Serves as chief of communications and public affairs, responsible for outreach
Responsible for witness and
victim support services
Registry
Oversees construction and maintenance of of Court facilities
Oversees Court security
Registry
Operates the Special Court’s on-site detention center, which currently houses 9 detainees indicted by the Prosecutor.
Office of the Prosecutor
David Crane, The Prosecutor, appointed in July 2002.
Responsible for investigation, indictment and prosecution
Multi-national staff of lawyers, investigators, paralegals, human rights researchers, support staff and translators
Volunteer forensic pathologists
Witness support team of mental health and social work professionals
Focus of Investigations
War Crimes
Crimes Against Humanity
Gender Crimes
Crimes Against Children
Indictments
As of June 2004, eleven persons associated with all three of the country's former warring factions stand indicted by the Special Court.
Two formerly indicted are now deceased.
Charles Taylor, former President of Liberia, resides in Nigeria and to date efforts to extradite him to Sierra Leone have been unsuccessful.
The Charges
They are charged with war crimes, crimes against humanity, and other serious violations of international humanitarian law.
Specifically, the charges include murder, rape, extermination, acts of terror, enslavement, looting and burning, sexual slavery, conscription of children into an armed force, and attacks on United Nations peacekeepers and humanitarian workers
Slide 67
Defense Office
Role of Defense Office
Role of Defense Office Cont.
Defense Teams
The Chambers
International panel of Judges appointed for 3-year terms by either United Nations or government of Sierra Leone
Trial Chamber:  2 United Nations appointments; 1 Sierra Leone appointment
Appellate Chamber:  3 United Nations appointments; 2 Sierra Leone appointments
Multi-national support staff
Appointment of a second Trial Chamber not yet announced
The Trials
Trials of 9 individual defendants consolidated by political faction
3 trials with 3 defendants each
CDF trial started on June 3, 2004
RUF trial started on July 5, 2004
Little or no documentary evidence
600 potential prosecution witnesses, both victims and combatants
Theory of Prosecution:
For the RUF and AFRC
War was a joint criminal enterprise to gain political power and control over territory of Sierra Leone, in particular of diamond mines and other resource rich areas of the country.
Defendants had command and control over armed forces engaged in widespread and systematic attacks on civilian populations.
Defendants have individual criminal responsibility for crimes planned, ordered, instigated or committed in furtherance of the joint criminal enterprise; and for crimes which were reasonably foreseeable as a consequence of participating in the joint criminal enterprise.
Theory of Prosecution:
For the CDF
The goal was to defeat by any means necessary the RUF and AFRC, and to eliminate those groups, their supporters, sympathizers, and anyone who did not actively resist the RUF/AFRC occupation of Sierra Leone; a common purpose or plan was devised to achieve this goal.
Defendants had command and control over armed forces charged with carrying out this purpose or plan.
Defendants have individual criminal responsibility for crimes planned, instigated, ordered committed within this common purpose; and for crimes which were reasonably foreseeable as a consequence of the common purpose or plan.
Unresolved Issues
Extradition, trial and conviction of Charles Taylor as critical to success of Special Court and international rule of law
Post-conviction detention concerns
Ongoing witness support and protection
Failure of Court to complete work within budget and/or timeframe
Legacy of the Special Court: Tangible Results
Infrastructure:  Court’s 11 acre compound, including all facilities, library, detention center, offices, furnishings (estimated value 8 to 10 million dollars)
Trained cadre of Sierra Leone professionals in all aspects of Court’s work (judges, lawyers, investigators, prison guards, witness support and protection, court administration)
Working model of international criminal court sited in post-conflict country, with a limited mandate, budget and existence
Aspirational Legacy
The TRC’s Relationship with the Special Court
Timing:
The work of the TRC and the Special Court overlapped for a period of time, generating confusion in the public regarding the roles of each body
Testimony:
Also was confusion as to whether testimony in front of the TRC could be used in the Special Court hearing
Chief Prosecutor eventually made it clear that he would not used any testimony from the TRC to seek indictments
Sam Hinga Norman and three others detained by the Special Court wanted to testify in front of the TRC.
Special Court would not allow it unless the testimony was taped, the TRC considered this unacceptable and Norman and the others were not allowed to testify
Minnesota Advocates’ Work
Freetown, Sierra Leone
Jembe Refugee Camp, Kenema District
Slide 83
Minnesota Advocates’ Work
Organizations and Individuals Interviewed
● Victims
● Civil Society Groups
● TRC staff and commissioners
● Government (Ministry of Justice, Police, Parliament, Judiciary)
● Special Court for Sierra Leone (Prosecutor, Defence, Chambers, Registry)
● UNAMSIL
● U.S. and European government officials
● Media
Organizations and Individuals Interviewed
Organizations and Individuals Interviewed
On-site Inspection
Inspected amputee camps in Freetown and Kono District.
On-site Inspection
Inspected detention facilities
   at the Special Court
Visited torture treatment center
Fact-Finding in The Hague
Interviewed staff at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
Challenges for Sierra Leone
Conditions that caused the war (poverty, corruption, lack of access to education, inequitable distribution of resources) remain.
International community is withdrawing.
Question whether government will have political will to implement TRC’s recommendations.
Criminal justice system unable to handle prosecutions of individuals who committed crimes during war but weren’t tried by SCSL.
Nigeria has not extradited Charles Taylor.
Slide 91
Positive Factors for Sierra Leone
First local elections in 34 years held in May 2004. Many think it will result in accountability.
SCSL impact – police and lawyers trained; new awareness about justice and human rights.
Proposed National Human Rights Commission; human rights civil society groups will have seat.
TRC Final Report expected to be good and strong outreach planned.
New ratings system for clean diamonds.
Slide 93
What Can the International Community Do to Support Transitional Justice?
Educate yourself.
Help raise awareness in the U.S. about transitional justice issues.
Demand that the country’s government follow-through and implement TRC recommendations.
Encourage the U.S. government to support the transitional justice process.
Work for the extradition of those responsible for human rights abuses.